February 8, 2016
 
 
 
 
FERC: Hold Your Horses!

On Thursday, Feb. 25, Kinder Morgan filed this letter with FERC’s docket for the Connecticut Expansion pipeline project (Docket #CP14-529).  They’re asking for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to be approved by February 29, 2016, so that they can complete tree-cutting by the March 31 deadline required by the Federal Endangered Species Act to protect bats.

COMMENT on FERC Docket #CP14-529 TODAY to tell FERC to hold their horses and not rush to meet Kinder Morgan’s unrealistic demands.

There are several reasons why FERC should ignore this request for an expedited decision on the pipeline project:

— 404 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATE
The required Water Quality 404 certificate from the Army Corp of Engineers has not been approved.

— 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATES
The required Water Quality 401 certificate has not been approved by Massachusetts. According to FERC’s recent decisions on the Constitution pipeline, tree-cutting in NY could not be allowed until that project’s 401 WQC was passed in that state. Not only same rule should apply for this pipeline project, but FERC should be pressed to go one better and not allow tree cutting ANYWHERE on the project, not just in states where the WQC has not been approved.

— MA ARTICLE 97
Article 97-protected lands have not been disposed for development. The CT Expansion project would cut directly through Otis State Forest in Massachusetts. This is land protected by Article 97 of the MA State Constitution. Releasing this land from its conservation restriction would require a 2/3 vote of BOTH houses of the MA Legislature, a vote that has stalled in committee with no vote in sight. FERC should make disposition of Article 97 lands provisional to approval of ANY pipeline in Massachusetts.

— QUESTION OF NEED FOR PROJECT
The question of whether or not the project is actually needed has not been determined. The Connecticut local distribution companies (LDCs) are downgrading their need projections. They have not converted nearly as many customers to natural gas heating as they have projected (which is what the need is based upon) and with the price of oil dropping, they are very unlikely to do so.

— IMPROPER SEGMENTATION
The question of whether the CT Expansion and Northeast Energy Direct projects are truly separate projects has not been addressed.



FEATURED EVENTS!
Check No Fracked Gas in Mass' Events page often for more







Visit No Fracked Gas in Mass' Ongoing Events page for weekly vigils and protests

NEW TO THE PIPELINE MOVEMENT?
We'd like to welcome all our new subscribers and invite you to look over our Getting Started and Act Now pages to see ideas on how you and your community can fight the pipeline!

Join us on Facebook and Twitter for ongoing conversations and discussion.
 
 
 
 
 
Fighting the Pipelines
Thanks to Your Help!


As the FERC, DPU and DOE processes continue, there will be lots more information to share with local communities. We'll keep providing research and guidance to help keep everyone informed and participating in the fight. This requires substantial ongoing operating funds to keep us working at optimal effectiveness.

No Fracked Gas in Mass is a program of Berkshire Environmental Action Team. Donations made through our direct online Donation button or mailed in check are tax deductible!
 
 
                        
Footer-logo